Deep Ancestors: Practicing the Religion ofthe Proto-Indo Europeans, Hearth Culture
Study, Proto-Indo-European
by Ceisiwr Serith
298
pages
ADF
Publishing; 2009
Since there are no
approved books (and very few books at all) on the pre-Roman Gauls and their
culture and religion, I chose to read Ceisiwr Serith's Deep Ancestors for my
first review.
Serith's book is
well researched, and clearly defines the difference between his own speculative
and reconstructed material, and that which is taken from archaeological and
other sources. The first section covers the basics of the Proto-Indo-European
(PIE) hypothesis and defines terms (this material should be familiar to anyone
who has done any PIE study in the past). Once past the introductory material we
move into the meat of the book.
The part of the book
I found most interesting and helpful was the comparative mythology. Serith
shows us piece by piece how the creation myths are reconstructed from the myths
of the descendant Indo-European (IE) cultures. This transitions easily into a reconstructed
PIE pantheon. The linguistic connections between names and concepts are helpful
to round out some of the related deities and processes that aren't well
attributed in descendant IE cultures.
PIE social structure
and ethics are also addressed, from the basic social structure of a community
(*wiks) to the ethical constructs and principles that define the boundaries of
the PIE morality and worldview. Dumezil's
trifunctional hypothesis is explored in the social roles of warrior, leader and
producer. Their moral and ethical system is expressed in the interplay of two
principles: *Xartus, the cosmic order, and *ghosti-, reciprocity. The
interconnectedness of these two principles gives meaning to the daily lives and
frames a set of social and ritual obligations that defines PIE ethics. Order
must remain in balance with primal chaos, and the people must perform their
roles in order to support and uphold the *Xartus.
The second half of
the book which included the reconstructed PIE rituals (which were incredibly
diverse, ranging from seasonal rituals, to sacrifices, to life mile-stones) was
no less fascinating, if somewhat less practically interesting to me. I am not a
reconstructionist, but I still found many pieces of information and ritual
construction that could be gleaned from the rituals. I especially liked the
wedding and funerary rites, which I have not encountered in many other ritual
guides.
Serith's description
of PIE sacrificial practices and his modern, more humane, alternatives are
useful for understanding the basis of sacrifice as a practice, as it is fairly
alien to those of us who, like myself, came out of a background in which sacrifice
was seen as unnecessary and primitive.
No comments:
Post a Comment